Monday, June 17. 2013Publisher Double Dealing on OATrackbacks 
                    
                        Trackback specific URI for this entry
                     
                    No Trackbacks 
            Comments 
                Display comments as
                                    (Linear | Threaded)
                                 
                
                    Bjorn Brembs asks "Do you know if it would still be legal to automate the "request a copy" button such that author's institutions handle it for them in an automated way? 
        
    If that were the case, could that be used to allow access to back-archives of toll-access articles, in lieu of (or complementing) ILL?" REPLY: No, it wouldn't be legal. Reprint requests can only be legally fulfilled by the author. Otherwise it's 3rd-party republication or bootleg...  | 
            
    
    
    
    QuicksearchMaterials You Are Invited To Use To Promote OA Self-Archiving:
Videos:
 The American Scientist Open Access Forum has been chronicling and often directing the course of progress in providing Open Access to Universities' Peer-Reviewed Research Articles since its inception in the US in 1998 by the American Scientist, published by the Sigma Xi Society.     The Forum is largely for policy-makers at universities, research institutions and research funding agencies worldwide who are interested in institutional Open Acess Provision policy.  (It is not a general discussion group for serials, pricing or publishing issues: it is specifically focussed on institutional Open Acess policy.)
 
        You can sign on to the Forum  here. 
    ArchivesCalendar
 CategoriesBlog AdministrationStatisticsLast entry: 2018-09-14 13:27 
1129 entries written 
238 comments have been made 
Top Referrers | 
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||